The hawala system, which has its roots in South Asia and the Middle East, stood out because it allowed for the transfer of funds without any actual currency moving. This approach was stealthy, quick, and frequently slipped by regulatory oversight. Ideal for people who want to keep their transactions private. However, the advent of cryptocurrencies introduced a new player with what appeared to be comparable qualities.
There are several benefits to using bitcoin and other digital currencies. It is easy to anticipate that they would provide the best conduits for unlawful operations, including financing terrorism, given the decentralized networks and possibility for anonymity.
But there’s a problem. The intrinsic transparency of the blockchain, where each transaction leaves a digital trail, stands in stark contrast to the covert operations of hawalas.
Blockchain technology, especially, provides unmatched transparency. Every transaction, no matter how minor, is recorded on a public ledger that anyone can access and verify. There’s a certain clarity.
However, this clarity isn’t just about seeing who paid whom. It’s about understanding the broader geopolitical implications. Take, for example, the case of Hamas. The organization, which many countries classify as a terrorist group, once turned to cryptocurrency as a means of bypassing traditional financial blockades. Yet, the very transparency of blockchain also means that such transactions don’t go unnoticed. While the decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies can make them appealing for groups looking to sidestep conventional financial systems, they also leave a trail that can be tracked and analyzed.
Former Director Morell’s views on the topic emphasize that while cryptocurrency presents certain challenges, especially in the realm of security and monitoring, its inherent transparency could very well be an asset in the larger scheme of things. In other words, while some entities might see digital currencies as a way around the system, the system itself—thanks to its transparency—might just be their undoing.
Back to ‘Understanding the Blockchain Influence on Israel-Palestine Relations.’
